Monday, March 31, 2008

Why so Blu: the Real Story Why Blu-ray beat HD-DVD...


Most of the debate these past few months have been over the rivalry between two HD formats known as Blu-ray and HD-DVD, then after nearly 2 years of battling each other for a hold of the market and offering superior quality to the long-standing DVD format, Blu-ray finally put the fork into all of HD-DVD's dreams.

Experts will analyze this situation and offer numbers about many factors including how how Sony made the wise choice of including a Blu-ray player standard inside ALL of their PS3 machines, whereas HD-DVD was only an optional upgrade for the Xbox systems from Microsoft. Others will analyze the various studio supporters for the two formats and draw comparisons from that or from the vendors, but I think the answer comes down to something more basic....color & phonetics.

Blu-ray won because it's blue. What?

Blue is typically a color that is more appealing to the eye and is often used to convey a calmness and appeal factor versus red, which is a much stronger and bolder color by nature. Red was the color of choice for HD-DVD and their packaging. It only makes sense that Blu-ray chose blue, but the packaging of their media helped play a vital part of the win.

The other is simple phonetics. Try saying "H-Dee-Dee-Vee-Dee" a couple times over and over. It's exhausting. "Blooo Ray" on the other hand rolls out naturally and feels more expressive, it also sounds different. HD-DVD no doubt explains what it is...it's a DVD, but with HD capabilities, which is essentially what both formats are in the short of it, but people need to know that they are upgrading to something 'better' than a DVD and a "Blu-ray" sounds different, where HD-DVD still sounds similar.

So that's it...Blu-ray inevitably won because it's easier to say and looks better from an aesthetically pleasing marketing perspective. Crazy eh?

Both Blu-ray and HD-DVD delivered nearly the same thing, but the fact that neither were cross-compatible made it a tricky sale for many, but the fact that HD-DVD players and Blu-ray players can upscale current DVD movies is a huge bonus. Now that Blu-ray is the clear victor and the studio support is quickly moving that direction we will certainly see a drop in price over the next year on the hardware and software and look forward to exciting titles being released!

Friday, March 28, 2008

Having a bad day????

Just watch this compilation of scenes from the remake THE WICKER MAN starring Nicolas Cage....

Thursday, March 27, 2008

The Foreign Correspondant...


I've decided to write up a list of 10 Foreign films that should be on everyones must-see list, but tried to stay away from the obvious choices. I'll also try and pick a different country for each selection, and they are:

10. Luis Bunuel's THAT OBSCURE OBJECT OF DESIRE (1977) - I love the description I read for this film: a dizzying game of sexual politics punctuated by a terror that harkens back to Bunuel's brilliant surrealistic beginnings. What's interesting here (not sure how many other films have done this or tried to do this), but the lead female character changes back and forth between different lead actresses throughout the film representing different characteristics of the female persona. France

9. Sergei Eisenstein's IVAN THE TERRIBLE PARTS I and II (1946) - gutsy film that dares to bash the Stalinist politics right under the governments noses in sub verse and complex filmmaking, but yet at the same time it's pretty obvious too. It's no wonder the film was banned for well over a decade. Russia

8. Seijun Sezuki's YOUTH OF THE BEAST (1963) - if you thought Scorsese was a good gangster-genre filmmaker, think again. Sezuki made several great ones including this one and it's flat out brilliant in just about every way imaginable, plus a glorious color palette that will have you drooling. Japan

7. Kadar and Klos' THE SHOP ON MAIN STREET (1965) - perhaps one of the most surprisingly tragic if all films that only echoes the oppression felt during the time in Czechoslovakia. The camera work and editing is first rate and way ahead of it's time. Czech

6. John Schlesingers' BILLY LIAR (1963) - I just love this film and it's one of the most beautifully shot scope films in B&W, plus it's a dark comedy too, making that even a more rare occurance, but this film is a real hoot! Britain

5. I AM CUBA (1964) - brilliant b&w photography and hand-held camera shots with long takes set this film apart as one of a kind, but the beauty of this stylistic film only help narrate the 4 vignettes that help to explain the situation of a devastated and unreformed Cuba. Cuba

4. Ingmar Bergman's THE SILENCE (1963) - this gorgeous film is often grouped together with 2 other films to complete the trilogy: WINTER LIGHT and THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY, but this film stands out amongst the bunch as one of the most beautifully shot films ever with some ingenious camera work by long-time collaborated Sven Nykvist and this film easily helped influence Stanley Kubrick 17 years later with THE SHINING. Interesting how even the titles are nearly the same too. Sweden

3. Wong Kar-wai's IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE (2000) - is perhaps one of the most gorgeous films shot in the past 10 years and just dazzles in beauty that it's hard to not keep recommending this film. Hong Kong

2. Peter Weir's PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK (1975) - odd and haunting this strange story about a bunch of schoolgirls who go missing at the mysterious rocks quickly turns into a suspenseful adventure that is hard to forget about and the music and sound truly make this a unique experience. Australia

1. Pasolini's THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW (1963) - interesting Italian portrayal of the last days of Christ and certainly one of the better interpretations on celluloid. Italy

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Let's Go Pens!


NHL playoffs are just around the corner and this year has been an exciting one on several fronts. With the new scoring style the divisions and conferences are super-tight meaning that even up to the playoffs teams are battling game after game. It's very easy with a string of wins or loses to go from the top to the bottom and that makes hockey one of the most exciting sports to watch end to end. The Pens have also played well this season despite some incredible obstacles: injuries galore. Fleury, Roberts, Crosby, etc etc. have all been injured for long periods of time, but that didn't stop The Pens from playing well mainly due to some important key players: Ty Conklin, Evgeni Malkin, and Ryan Malone. These three players have really stepped up in important ways during the injury prone season to lead the Penguins to the playoffs this year! Woohoo. I've had the joy of being able to attend 7 games this year and have seen more wins than loses including perhaps one of the best games i've ever seen live against the Flyers in which the Pens won 7-1 and just dominated them from whistle to whistle. There have been some other surprises this year besides Ryan Malone and Petr Sykora having incredible seasons and that is the aquisition of 2 players during a trade that have been huge assets to this team already, they are defensemen Hal Gill and forward Pascal Dupuis who have contributing some major offense and defense to this team, although Marian Hossa was a big bonus for The Pens too, even though they lost a few decent players.

So it looks like they are ready to rumble in the playoffs and have a strong, young team to do so, but I thought I would add my few cents as to what needs to happen for them to win the cup this year:

1. Crosby needs to be back and healthy.
2. Fleury needs help with rebounds and defense needs to keep the shots minimal.
3. Passing needs to be fluid and consistent.
4. Malkin needs to step up like he has even when Crosby is back.
5. Hossa and Crosby will need to find quick chemistry together.
6. The minor players need to step up as well: Kennedy, Ruutu, Taffe, Talbot.
7. Need offensive power from d-line as well: Whitney, Letang, Gonchar.
8. Powerplay needs to be hot hot hot.
9. No unecessary penalties, keep aggressive play, but play smart.
10. Team needs to be healthy and rested when possible.

I have a hard time seeing the Pens winning this year there is some seriously strong contention in the West with teams like San Jose and Detroit playing CRAZY this year.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Farewell Arthur C. Clarke...


Science Fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, who 40 years ago would make history with Stanley Kubrick on 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, dies at the ripe age of 90. His story The Sentinel would be transformed into one of the greatest Science Fiction films ever made and together with Kubrick would pull no punches with a Science Fiction film like no-other. A film that is incredibly deep in it's thematic elements, but also poses some of the biggest philosophical questions that very few books or films manage to do. Clark also helmed some other important Science Fiction works and his ability to write complex works in deep Scientific realms certainly translated differently in screen adaptation with Kubrick being the only one to really master the material in a serious way.

It's also interesting that just recently Universal HD played 2001 and it looked AMAZING! Of course, the Blu-ray release of the film is incredible as well and if you ever have a chance of seeing this film in HD, do it without a second thought, but ultimately the film is required to be seen during EVERYONE's life, preferably on film, 35mm will do, although the film was shot in 70mm, so if you get a chance to see a restored 70mm screening of the film, invite everyone you know too! I've seen this film about 200 times and in a wide variety of formats, but it was with my most recent viewing of the film that I really began to appreciate the simplicity of the films surface and how much the film does with little. Now this is not to say that there is not a ton of production, sets, props, acting, etc going on, but rather just how patient and reserved the film is. It pulls you in and desperately wants the audience to be a part of the story. In doing so, the film breaks many of the standard conventions of narrative and film-making and would break rules in many other ways as well, making it one of the most innovative films of all time, this coupled with Clarke's imagination and depth and you have an instant classic that has only appreciated in value over the past 40 years making it one of the greatest Science Fiction stories and films ever produced.

Clarke will certainly be remembered as one of the great Science Fiction writers of the 20th century, but anyone who has seen 2001, owes a great deal of thanks for his incredible vision as the world of film is clearly a bit better because of this film.

Friday, March 14, 2008

a film like no other: Fritz Lang's Metropolis


It's astonishing to think that there were very few Science Fiction films made prior to World War II, but it's even more astonishing after seeing the visionary genius of Fritz Lang's 1927 METROPOLIS and how daring, bold, and pioneering the film truly was and still is. It has been imitated ever since and nearly ever Science Fiction film owes some degree of respect towards this film. The film is about a future in which there are only two societies: the thinkers and the workers. The only problem is that they are co-dependent upon each other as the thinkers are not really sure 'how' things work while the works are able to make things work, but have no vision to see them through, they just DO the work. So the two must work together, but the crux of the film really takes shape when one of the thinkers decided to venture into the workers area to see what their life is like and is appalled at their bot-like behaviors.

Of course the film runs much deeper than this as this is just the surface story that is happening, but there is much more woven into the fabric of this cinematic masterpiece and it's revolutionary style, form, and production. Amazingly enough the film holds up incredibly well even after 80+ years and is a MUST SEE for any serious Science Fiction fan. I am reminded recently of this film as there seems to be (especially with the recent 2 terms of Mr. Bush) a certain move towards 2 social statuses (lower and upper AKA "haves" and "have-nots"), but even more specific we have the workers and those who are in control of the workers, not necessarily the 'thinkers', but rather the ones with power, typically political power brought on primarily by who you know and how much money you have. What is more frustrating is that the 'workers' outnumber the 'thinkers', but are unorganized and are kept in their position by way of custom. When people are overworked and living in fear, it's hard to become organized and day-to-day mundane-ness seems at least comforting as opposed to putting effort into getting organized and making a difference for the better, having a voice. Maybe we can hope for a 'thinker' to step into our world and see what it's like....just maybe.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

...is Road House the greatest film ever made?


For those of you who have had the absolute joy of seeing 1989's Road House starring none other than Patrick Swayze, you already know the answer. I decided to look up the plot summary to this in-depth film, but was surprised to see just a simple sentence: A tough bouncer is hired to tame a dirty bar. How on earth could THAT be the plot? I mean, what about the deep character development? What about the layers of profound meaning? I mean, Patrick Swayze does not do bad movies, only classics, so there has GOT to be more to this film than just a bar bouncer and the trouble that ensues...could there?

Turns out the entire film is actually a metaphor for life in general and the characters are semi-based on Greek Mythology with some Biblical references as well. Check out just a taste of the films dialogue and see if you can immediately see the connection to Shakespeare....

Wade Garrett: "This place has a sign hangin' over the urinal that says, "Don't eat the big white mint".

The film also offers some amazing, deep, profound insights to life as well...

Dalton: "All you have to do is follow three simple rules. One, never underestimate your opponent. Expect the unexpected. Two, take it outside. Never start anything inside the bar unless it's absolutely necessary. And three, be nice. "

Lines like this it's tragic that the film couldn't have been released at a time when Laurence Olivier could have read those lines of potent prose. Although Swayze shines through in his astounding performance as he acts tough through the entire film, occasionally tells his face to be tough as well, and shoots out snappy dialogue like a fully automatic BB gun.

The film is also very psychological bringing about the inner being of a man and offers opportunities throughout for any man to let out his Tim Taylor-inspired grunts, which can of course act as a mediator of social interaction with females. This movie can also single-handedly serve the male ego in significant ways as this movie offers the quintessential qualities of any macho-laded adventure. If that's not enough, they did make a sequel!!

One of my favorite clips...EVER!

Mustache...

Saturday, March 8, 2008

10 of the worst films ever pressed into celluloid: or 20 hours I wish I had back in my life...

This list does not contain movies that are just poorly made, as in cheap student films or low-budget productions that at least have an excuse, rather this is a list of big-budget films that wasted money as if it were water. These are productions that were actually 'approved' for the public and it's amazing that someone actually released these torture-tests to the general public without at least a warning of some sorts, like ...this film is rated "C" for coma, which is likely how you will find yourself after viewing.

10. The Patriot - I really wanted to like Mel Gibson's American Revolution War film, but it didn't take long before the authenticity of the film was jeopardized by a ludicrous plot and the direction and inconsistency of this film. It's amazing that it goes over the heads of thinking adults. This is evident in a crucial scene involving a church full of innocent people who are torched to death, but unfortunately the scene is inserted into the film for such a brief moment that we don't even have the ability to care about the people involved as it's treated with about as much emotion as a chunk of granite. Of course leave it to renegade Mel to beat those Brits yet again with his sharp-shooter sons.

9. The Ladykillers (remake) - Joel & Ethan Coen, as well as Tom Hanks, really should have spent their time doing another project rather than 'try' to modernize The Ladykillers, which they pretty much desecrated to no end and instead made a film that's as embarrassing to watch as I am sure it is to have credited to your name, this film could have single-handedly ended the careers of all involved, for some, it's a good thing it didn't.

8. Planet of the Apes (remake) - I like Mark Wahlberg and I also like Tim Burton, but what on earth were they thinking with this one? There are some films that shouldn't even be considered as potential remake material and the 1968 film is one of them, it's a Science Fiction great that can't be outdone, so why bother trying to make it over again? Wahlberg is lucky that his run of remakes didn't ruin his career when he made 3 films in 4 years that were remakes and all were failures to some degree, although The Italian Job was the most tolerable.

7. Minority Report - This film is so laughable that's it's hard to imagine that Steven Spielberg made it, but he sure did. Although there is nothing original about the concept and it's basically a conglomeration of other good science fiction films, however, the cut & paste method that Spielberg tries to do here just flops. Let's just put it this way... the future is so advanced and technology is so good, yet for some reason people mistake billboards for real people. Enough said.

6. The Pianist - Despite being exiled from America, director Roman Polanski still manages to make very good films, this isn't one of them, although it's dressed up to look like one. I wanted to love this film and there were parts that I enjoyed, mostly the music, but for the most part it was merely a drawn out, unrealistic, and predictable train wreck that seemed void of emotion, just like Adrien Brody's face most of the time. The casting was probably one of the worst in a long time and didn't help matters, fortunately I know that Polanski is a good filmmaker and he can always redeem himself. Instead of seeing this film, watch The Black Book from director Paul Verhoeven.

5. The Truth About Charlie (remake of Charade) - Oh the humanity! One of my beloved favorites showed up in this concoction with yet again Mark Wahlberg. What is he thinking? Well, fortunately there are two things that are true. 1. Hardly anyone saw this film and 2. Most people didn't see the connection to Charade from 1963 since the title changed. If you want to see a real film check out Charade instead starring the always awesome Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn.

4. A Beautiful Mind - I know that many were fooled by this film, but not I. In fact I was one of the few who actually stood up after the movie was over in the theater and was booing. Yes, booing. Many were clapping, but I was in shock that people actually enjoyed this farce of a film. Now here's how it works. You see, Ron Howard (you remember him from Happy Days right?) well, you see he tries to be a real filmmaker and he has certainly had some luck (Apollo 13 to name one of them), but every once in awhile he needs to fake his talent and the way he does that is with a sweeping music score to cover up sections of his films that are void of emotion, sense, logic, or rationality. The ending of this film is so cliched, dull, and insanely annoying that I was just appalled when I actually saw people hailing this movie with clapping. I mean, I see many good films that other people really enjoy, but they don't clap at the end. Why were they clapping in this one? They were fooled! The music at the end of the film actually makes it seem like the joke of a film that you've just spent 2 hours watching was worth it. Then again the entire film plays with the viewers emotions just as much as it does with it's characters and ultimately trivializes the life of John Nash.

3. Million Dollar Baby - I love Clint Eastwood! Always have. But I think his directing days are numbered and a film like this is evidence of just that. Instead of wasting your time with this wannabee artsy boxing movie with political and socially skewed layers, check out Cinderella Man starring Russell Crowe. I personally love the scene where Eastwood just walks right into a so-called hospital and pulls the plug on Miss Swank without a soul noticing.

2. Psycho (remake) - Just utter nonsense here as director Gus van Sant decided to make money on re-shooting Alfred Hitchcock's classic film. I say re-shoot because that's precisely what he did, he just re-shot the exact same film just inserted different actors, so that begs the question...what's the point? My thoughts exactly.

1. A.I. Artificial Intelligence - Stanley Kubrick did not make very many films over his incredibly long career. Much of that is because when he did make a film, he poured his heart and soul into that film and when it was done, it was a masterful work of cinema. His projects sometimes took years to make, but you knew when it was released that you were indeed seeing something special. Unfortunately he didn't live long enough to make a film he had always wanted to, A.I. The torch was then handed down to crowd-pleaser Steven Spielberg who has always had success (mostly commercial, not critical) in the Science Fiction genre and he seemed like the person to handle this work. Well, think again. What ultimately happens though is that Spielberg is trapped about 30-minutes into the film with a story and plot that he just doesn't know what to do with it, so rather than head into a logical direction, the film meanders on for what seems an eternity as it goes goofy to crazy to just all-out silly by the time the 2 1/2 hours are finally over. It's hard to believe that Spielberg could make a boring film, but this one is surely that as it's evident that he is trying to make something that is beyond him, it's not his forte and rather than acknowledge that this deep, logical, emotional theme needs to be handled with craft that a master like Kubrick could do, we end up with Spielberg train wrecking it without a care in the world for the viewer.

Friday, March 7, 2008

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Ice: the color of Heaven...

I've decided my dream vacation....well, at least one place that I would really want to go before I die, The Ice Hotel. Each year a new Ice Hotel is constructed in Sweden during certain parts of the year there is enough ice and snow that a Hotel can be constructed and a team of artists come to help design the new look for the Hotel as it changes every year, there was a documentary on the Ice Hotel a few years ago on one of the HD channels that was really awesome.

www.icehotel.com

So why would anyone in their right minds want to go there? Well for me I really love the cold weather and ice. Everyone complains about snow and ice, but that's when it's an inconvenience, not made into a luxury as with this. The only time something feels cold is when we are not used to it, once you acclimate yourself to a certain area, then it seems normal. I love the way ice looks with all sorts of light coming through it, there are all different blues and hues and interesting shades that you don't always see together. Each room is carved and there are many artists who carve unique designs to give the Hotel it's amazing and creative look.

No Country for Old Men...


Finally got around to seeing this film on the big-screen and the wait was well worth it as the latest film from Joel and Ethan Coen was just brilliant. I have seen all of their work and for the most part always look forward to seeing their films, with a few exceptions like the remake of THE LADYKILLERS, which was beyond awful and INTOLERABLE CRUELTY, which is about as ironic as a horrible movie can have.

Anyway, enough about those two poor outings because if faith ever needed to be restored in Joel and Ethan, this is it. I can honestly say that it has been a long, long time since I have been to a movie where I was engaged from the first frame to the last, but this was it. Not only that, but I was totally absorbed into this film, which is a rare treat these days and I might even go on record as saying that this is probably the most mature film to come out of Hollywood in about 5 years. Simply put, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN is definitely worth the praise that it has been getting.

Now like the other films of Joel and Ethan, this is not a movie everyone will like, or even understand, but I was hooked right away into the world it created. Unlike any of their films before, this one carries a heavy load and would be similar to some of their darker and more serious work like BLOOD SIMPLE, MILLERS CROSSING, and THE MAN WHO WASN'T THERE, all of which are brilliant in their own right, yet their latest entry goes above and beyond in many ways. This is clearly a film made by competent filmmakers who are hitting their stride again and they are taking no prisoners as this film gets right to the point in the first few moments and never lets go until the very end. I can only hope this is a taste of what is yet to come from the Bros.

With the exception of some of David Cronenberg's work of late (i.e. EASTERN PROMISES and A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE) this movie has some of the most graphic violence in many years, but it's valuable to the plot and character development and the Coen's know how to work with it in a respectful, realistic, and important way. Our story quickly picks up as a hunter (Josh Brolin in a superb understated role) stumbles across a drug deal gone bad in 1980 somewhere out in the deserts of the Rio Grande. Bodies are shot up everywhere and there is a stash of 2 million dollars left for him to 'have'. Well, this drug money needs a home, so why not make off with it? Well, money like that doesn't just disappear without some retribution and before too long people are after him. He is no square though, he knows the reality of the situation and understands full-well what type of danger he is in, so he packs up his wife and off he goes in an attempt to thwart the attempts on his life. One dangerous man though is quick to follow though, as this professional assassin (Javier Bardim) doesn't have a sense of humor about the situation and will kill anyone or anything in his path.

Tommy Lee Jones (in one of his best performances in years) plays a nearly retired sheriff who is good as solving cases, but he is torn with the way that things are going in the world as he starts to see new patterns of horrible events, his father and grandfather were also lawmen and his heart is in it, but his mind is telling him that things are not like they used to be in the 'good ole days' when people respected one another. Sure, there was killing, but it made sense, these days it doesn't seem to have a rhyme or reason to it.

Now unlike so many cliched films, what sets this one truly above and beyond is that the characters of this film do not intersect one another in obvious ways, the story lines naturally progress and come together in very interesting, unique, realistic, and profound ways that only true masters like Joel and Ethan could pull together in a way that would still be eventful and equally entertaining.

To say I loved this film would be an understatement. I simply identified with the film and the feelings of the characters in a profound way, especially since it was set in a certain era, which actually made me think back to my grandparents and how I was raised where things were just different. People acted a different way and you treated people like they were people, but in this day and age, everyone keeps to themselves. Although the one realization that the film makes is that there will always be dangerous people doing dangerous things, and that we need good people to always protect and to make right those wrongs, there needs to be someone to uphold justice in this world.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Listen of the Day: Of Montreal


Wow, came across this really great release from a band called Of Montreal and their 2007 entitled Hissing Fauna, Are you the Destroyer? It's bizarre, but infectious at the same time.

10 Movies for Easter...


Here are just a few great movies to visit or revisit during the Easter season...

10. The Greatest Story Ever Told
9. The Robe
8. The Ten Commandments
7. King of Kings
6. Jesus Christ Superstar
5. The Last Temptation of Christ
4. Ben-Hur
3. Jesus of Nazareth
2. The Passion of the Christ
1. The Gospel According to St. Matthew

It's interesting that my favorite of these films is 1964's The Gospel According to St. Matthew directed by Italian filmmaker Pier Palo Pasolini and here he actually uses a majority of the text from Matthew.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

a Blography...

Today it occurred to me what the purpose of my blog is or will be. I've attempted to sum up what a blog is to several people, but for me I want my blog to essentially be me. Me that is, in pictures and paragraphs. What does that mean? Well, i've concluded that there are very very few people in the world who know me. Know me very well, know my interests, my likes, my dislikes, my hobbies, etc etc. So this blog will serve as not only 'things about me', but will serve as my biography written in real time, thus a blography. Unlike most biographies that are written about who a person was in the past and chronicling that into the present day (or present day that the biography is written) this blog will chronicle in real time my life as I choose to let it be known as a window for people to peer into the things that make me ...me.

Most people know that I love movies, which is the first layer into my life. However, very few know which movies I love, which movies I dislike, what makes a good movie in my opinion, or better yet...why love a certain movie. So, in some respects this blog will attempt to take away a few layers into the depths of my being and archive them in such a way that others can view and interact with.

So without further ado, keep reading.

Sunday, March 2, 2008

The Critical Critic...

The age old question: What makes art good?

Who determines what is art and what is not, or what is good and what is bad? Can't EVERYONE have an opinion? Can't anyone be a critic? Well, I feel a certain way about these things, the first is that everyone CAN have an opinion, but the validity of their opinion might be skewed. I'll use wine as my illustration.

If someone is a wine connoisseur and has been all over the world tasting wines in all different places, ages, and devotes much of their life to the taste of wine, would you value their opinion of wine more or less than a person who is giving their impression after their first taste of wine? Now, that person may taste wine for the first time and hate it. Fine. Maybe they got a bad bottle, brand, or maybe they just don't like the taste. However, because they have not tasted others or have a broad enough spectrum of wines, their viewpoint is limited with how they judge or critique that wine, so therefore they are probably not necessarily able to articulate what they do or don't like about it other than they know that they didn't like it. This is fine as well. However, that doesn't answer the other question, which is WHY. Critics of all kind need to be able to express WHY they do or don't like something, which is put into the context of their experiences and helps others understand their stance in the matter.

Now back to film...

Film is just the same, most people do not watch movies with the same lens as I do. They simply watch them to be 'entertained'. However, film is a lost art form. It is something that seldom people want to think about afterwards or have in-depth conversations over. The film medium has been reduced to just a quick entertainment fix. But can't our intellect be challenged and worked too and can't that be just as much fun? Some of the best films i've seen have led to awesome discussions afterwards and it's THOSE discussions that made the film all the more valuable in my eyes. One example is after a screening of a newly restored 35mm print of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and having a great discussion with a group of students over the films relevance, influence, and the central themes that the film manages to tie together in unique and deep ways. I agree that movies like this are NOT meant to be enjoyed by everyone, nor do I want to always watch movies that are intellectually stimulating, but I do firmly believe that a good critic and a fair critic is the one who is willing to experience as much as they can in order to be put their subject into a larger perspective.

So what makes a particular piece of art good? or bad? I suppose lots of things. What some people thing is great, others might think is garbage. However, a true critic goes beyond just the surface of the piece. They look at it from a historical perspective, they look at it through the eyes of the artist and gain a sense of how it makes them feel, does it evoke emotion? I could easily go into any art gallery and quickly walk up and down the halls and quickly point out which ones I prefer, which ones I would want on MY walls at home, but I couldn't tell you much about each one. I don't know the history of them, I don't know the style or the level of involvement with certain pieces, which inhibits my ability to fairly judge, I am simply going by my initial impression and reaction. Does that make my opinion wrong about it? No. Just limited again.

It's not a matter of right or wrong....can opinions be wrong? Yes. In my opinion the world is round, well technically it's not fully round, so factually I am wrong, it's more oval-like. In my opinion the MONA LISA is just Ok, well that's my limited opinion because truthfully I have never seen the MONA LISA up close and personal, but have only seen pictures in books, so that doesn't really qualify, which means I can't accurately comment on it. FULL METAL JACKET is the best war movie ever made! Really? Well, it might be my opinion that it's my favorite movie or favorite war movie, but to know if it's the best you need to see many war movies in order to know how it compares to the others before stamping it with a 'best ever' seal.

Anyone can have an opinion, not everyone can be a critic, at least not a good one.

Then again, that's just my opinion.